Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Añadir filtros

Base de datos
Tópicos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año
1.
Lancet ; 401(10388): 1584-1594, 2023 05 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20236681

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Sparsentan is a novel, non-immunosuppressive, single-molecule, dual endothelin and angiotensin receptor antagonist being examined in an ongoing phase 3 trial in adults with IgA nephropathy. We report the prespecified interim analysis of the primary proteinuria efficacy endpoint, and safety. METHODS: PROTECT is an international, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled study, being conducted in 134 clinical practice sites in 18 countries. The study examines sparsentan versus irbesartan in adults (aged ≥18 years) with biopsy-proven IgA nephropathy and proteinuria of 1·0 g/day or higher despite maximised renin-angiotensin system inhibitor treatment for at least 12 weeks. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive sparsentan 400 mg once daily or irbesartan 300 mg once daily, stratified by estimated glomerular filtration rate at screening (30 to <60 mL/min per 1·73 m2 and ≥60 mL/min per 1·73 m2) and urine protein excretion at screening (≤1·75 g/day and >1·75 g/day). The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline to week 36 in urine protein-creatinine ratio based on a 24-h urine sample, assessed using mixed model repeated measures. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were safety endpoints. All endpoints were examined in all participants who received at least one dose of randomised treatment. The study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03762850. FINDINGS: Between Dec 20, 2018, and May 26, 2021, 404 participants were randomly assigned to sparsentan (n=202) or irbesartan (n=202) and received treatment. At week 36, the geometric least squares mean percent change from baseline in urine protein-creatinine ratio was statistically significantly greater in the sparsentan group (-49·8%) than the irbesartan group (-15·1%), resulting in a between-group relative reduction of 41% (least squares mean ratio=0·59; 95% CI 0·51-0·69; p<0·0001). TEAEs with sparsentan were similar to irbesartan. There were no cases of severe oedema, heart failure, hepatotoxicity, or oedema-related discontinuations. Bodyweight changes from baseline were not different between the sparsentan and irbesartan groups. INTERPRETATION: Once-daily treatment with sparsentan produced meaningful reduction in proteinuria compared with irbesartan in adults with IgA nephropathy. Safety of sparsentan was similar to irbesartan. Future analyses after completion of the 2-year double-blind period will show whether these beneficial effects translate into a long-term nephroprotective potential of sparsentan. FUNDING: Travere Therapeutics.


Asunto(s)
Glomerulonefritis por IGA , Adulto , Humanos , Adolescente , Irbesartán/uso terapéutico , Glomerulonefritis por IGA/tratamiento farmacológico , Creatinina/orina , Proteinuria/tratamiento farmacológico , Método Doble Ciego , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Front Immunol ; 12: 712572, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1472386

RESUMEN

The complement system is central to first-line defense against invading pathogens. However, excessive complement activation and/or the loss of complement regulation contributes to the development of autoimmune diseases, systemic inflammation, and thrombosis. One of the three pathways of the complement system, the alternative complement pathway, plays a vital role in amplifying complement activation and pathway signaling. Complement factor D, a serine protease of this pathway that is required for the formation of C3 convertase, is the rate-limiting enzyme. In this review, we discuss the function of factor D within the alternative pathway and its implication in both healthy physiology and disease. Because the alternative pathway has a role in many diseases that are characterized by excessive or poorly mediated complement activation, this pathway is an enticing target for effective therapeutic intervention. Nonetheless, although the underlying disease mechanisms of many of these complement-driven diseases are quite well understood, some of the diseases have limited treatment options or no approved treatments at all. Therefore, in this review we explore factor D as a strategic target for advancing therapeutic control of pathological complement activation.


Asunto(s)
Factor D del Complemento/antagonistas & inhibidores , Vía Alternativa del Complemento/efectos de los fármacos , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Tejido Adiposo/metabolismo , Envejecimiento/inmunología , Vasculitis Asociada a Anticuerpos Citoplasmáticos Antineutrófilos/tratamiento farmacológico , Vasculitis Asociada a Anticuerpos Citoplasmáticos Antineutrófilos/inmunología , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/inmunología , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/terapia , Factor D del Complemento/biosíntesis , Factor D del Complemento/deficiencia , Factor D del Complemento/fisiología , Metabolismo Energético , Atrofia Geográfica/genética , Atrofia Geográfica/inmunología , Hemoglobinuria Paroxística/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemoglobinuria Paroxística/genética , Hemoglobinuria Paroxística/inmunología , Hepatocitos , Humanos , Enfermedades Renales/inmunología , Hígado/lesiones , Oligonucleótidos Antisentido/uso terapéutico , Péptidos Cíclicos/uso terapéutico , Fagocitosis
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA